Friday, May 27, 2016

The Cloudcast #254 - Container Deployments - Real Usage, Real Data

Brian talks with Kim Weins (@kimweins, VP of Marketing) and Tim MIller (@Miller_Tim, VP of Engineering) at @Rightscale about market adoption of DevOps and Containers, migrating applications to containers, and the challenges of a container-centric deployment to production.

Show Links:

 Show Notes:

  • Want to register for VelocityConf right now? Use code PCCLOUD20 for 20% off registration


Topic 1 - Give us a sense of the scope and scale of the Rightscale platform and how involved it is in companies and applications that are leveraging the fast growing public cloud.
Topic 1a - What were the biggest takeaways that you observed in the data from the 2016 Cloud / DevOps report?
Topic 2 - Why did Rightscale take on “Project Sherpa” in the first place?
Topic 3 - What were the initial big hurdles, red flags or things that told you that maybe this wasn’t a good idea? How did you overcome those challenges?
Topic 4 - What were some of the lessons you learned through the transition? Did you take a bimodal approach, or was this an “everybody” transition, or was there another people/culture/process approach?
Topic 5 - On the dev-side, containers are getting much better understood. How did you manage the ops portion?

 Feedback?
Posted by
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

The Cloudcast #253 - Jumping Inside Complex CI/CD Systems

Brian talks with Shlomi Ben Haim (@ShlomiBenHaim; CEO of @JFrog) about social software distribution platforms, the challenges of CI/CD systems, how non-tech-centric companies are embracing software cultures and if there are emerging ways to make new software development easier.

Show Links:

 Show Notes:

  • Want to register for VelocityConf right now? Use code PCCLOUD20 for 20% off registration


Topic 1 - Welcome to the show. Tell us a little bit about your journey with JFrog over the last 7 or 8 years.
Topic 1a - For anybody that isn’t familiar with all the things that JFrog brings to market, can you give us the high level overview?
Topic 2 - There’s lots of talk these days about cloud-native apps and microservices and software eating the world. But I feel like there isn’t enough discussion about getting all that software into production, which is the most important part. How well do companies understand that challenge and what tools are available to help them get better at testing and deploying?
Topic 3 - Everybody wants to highlight that software delivery can go faster, but it’s a complicated system with lots of inputs and outputs. Let’s talk a little bit about the key areas where companies need controls in that delivery system - either for managing lots of inputs, or managing security, or making sure that updates don’t break too many things in production.
Topic 4 - There are lots of Silicon Valley customers that discuss and use DevOps because their core business is technology. Can you give us some insights into how this evolution to “every business is a software business” outside of technology-centric companies?
Topic 5 - Building software is difficult. Are you seeing any trends that show you that there are new ways to make it easiest and more accessible to more companies?

 Feedback?
Posted by
Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, May 19, 2016

The Cloudcast #252 - Understanding IBM OpenWhisk

Brian talks with Stephen Fink (@sjfink, Distinguished Research Staff Member @IBM) about serverless computing, the architecture of IBM OpenWhisk, the open source community involvement and the use-cases he sees for this emerging technology.

Show Links:

 Show Notes:
    • Want to register right now for VelocityConf? Use code PCCLOUD20 for 20% off registration.


openwhisk-arch3.png



Topic 1 - Welcome to the show. Give us some of your background in IBM’s Research group.
Topic 2 - “Events-based” and “Serverless” are terms that are starting to become more widely used. What types of challenges (use-cases) did you hear from developers that led you to create OpenWhisk?
Topic 3 - Let’s talk about the OpenWhisk architecture. The OpenWhisk model consists of three concepts:
  • trigger: a class of events that can happen

  • action: an event handler — some code that runs in response to an event
 
  •  rule: an association between a trigger and an action


Topic 3a - What are some of the really important things that people need to know about OpenWhisk? How it is different from other serverless frameworks that are starting to come into the market?
Topic 4 - Let’s walk through some of the early use-cases you’ve seen (or built).
Topic 5 - OpenWhisk has gotten some attention because it’s open-source. It’s still early, but where do you expect to see the most contribution - core OpenWhisk or at the edges around things that are specific to application factors?

Feedback?
Posted by
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, May 12, 2016

The Cloudcast #251 - IT Tricks that SaaS services Forget

Brian talks with Gina Minks (@gminks, PMM for @SpanningBackup) about the growth of SaaS applications, who pays for SaaS, who manages SaaS and the most frequent mistakes companies make in using SaaS applications.

Show Links:
Show Notes:
  • Want to register for VelocityConf right now? Use code PCCLOUD20 for 20% savings - Gold, Silver, Bronze only


  • Topic 1 - Welcome back to the show, it’s been since Eps.68. What are you up to these days?
    • Topic 2 - Let’s talk about the SaaS market in general. It’s about a $75-80B market in 2016, growing at 20% CAGR. What big trends are you seeing in SaaS?
    • Topic 3 - We’ve both been around “traditional IT” for a while. What do you see that’s different about SaaS - who buys it, what’s the process, how do they think about on-going maintenance, etc.?
    • Topic 4 - Let’s get into your world - backing up SaaS applications. Give us the basics. What are the big mistakes most people make? Where does the backed up data go?
    • Topic 5 - The challenge with SaaS is that some applications go away, or they radically change their pricing model. Are there now utilities that will convert data to use other SaaS services?
    Feedback?
    Posted by
    Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

    Friday, April 29, 2016

    The Cloudcast #250 - A Platform View of Application Migrations

    Aaron talks with Sinclair Schuller (@sschuller; CEO/Founder of @Apprenda) about news at Apprenda, the Kubernetes community, legacy apps vs. cloud native apps and why architecture is critical in a PaaS platform.

    Show Links:
    Show Notes:
      • Want to register right now? Use code PCCLOUD for 30% OSCON registration
      • Want to attend OSCON for Free? Use code PCEXPO to get expo access for free.
    • Topic 1 - How are things going at Apprenda? It’s been way too long...l
    • Topic 2 - What is the state of “Platforms” these days? Are they structured vs. unstructured, Docker-capable vs. Non-Docker, or some other dominant architectural characteristics?
    • Topic 3 - Do platforms actually help companies build applications “faster”, or are they mostly there to automate the infrastructure and services under a platform?
    • Topic 4 - We read a whitepaper talking about how Apprenda helped a customer migrate 70+ applications to the platform in a really short period of time. What do these migrations look like?
    • Topic 5 - Apprenda recently added Kubernetes. What are the details around that and what value does it bring to customers?
    Feedback?
    Posted by
    Labels: , , , , , ,

    Monday, April 25, 2016

    The Cloudcast #249 - snap by Intel and Cloud Telemetry

    We're giving away two OSCON passes! Aaron talks with Matt Brender (@mjbrender, Developer Advocate for Intel Software Defined Infrastructure) about what it is like to be a Developer Advocate and snap by Intel for cloud telemetry.

    Show Links:
    Show Notes:
    • We're giving away 2x OSCON passes!
      • Send us your community story and why you want to go to OSCON via email or twitter (links below)
      • Bronze Level Passes - $1745 value
      • Can be given away together or seperate
      • 3 month subscription to Safari Pro
      • Want to register right now? Use code PCCLOUD for 30% OSCON registration
    • Topic 1 - Let’s start at the start, you have had an interesting journey to date in your move into your current role. Give everyone a brief intro to your journey and how you ended up at Intel
    • Topic 2 - We’ve had both Jonathan and Nick on a few times now so we won’t rehash the Intel SDI group, but I did want to talk about Nick’s blog post introducing snap by Intel. Specifically this concept of automating around stages of IRO (Intelligent Resource Orchestration) and the phases - Watching, Deciding, Acting, Learning. Is Intel creating SkyNet?
    • Topic 3 - Let’s dig into the snap framework announced in December. This brings to life the stages we previously mentioned through framework plugins for Collecting, Processing, and Publishing
    • Topic 4 - What will be the early use cases? When and where does Intel envision folks using this framework and for what purpose?
    • Topic 5 - How has the community embraced this so far? What challenges do you have as a Developer Advocate? What’s next for both snap and SDI in general?
    Feedback?
    Posted by
    Labels: , , , , , , ,

    Thursday, April 21, 2016

    The Cloudcast #248 - Trouble Inside Your Containers

    Aaron and Brian talk with Tim Gerla (@tybstar, VP Product) and Dan Nurmi (@dannurmi, CTO) at @Anchore about their background as entrepreneurs, the challenges of container security, the challenges of CI/CD and security and how to avoid slowly down developers.

    Show Links:

    Topic 1 - Get an understanding of the team and their background

    Topic 2 - What customer challenge is Anchore attempting to solve? What are some of the scary security/container stories out there?

    Topic 2a - Let’s talk about awareness of this security challenge, especially amongst Dev teams vs. Ops teams.

    Topic 3 - Anchore was founded by people from Eucalyptus and Ansible, which were very popular open-source projects. Does Anchore have an open-source model as well?

    Topic 4 - How does Anchore fit into existing "container" systems and PaaS like Docker (or Docker Data Center), Cloud Foundry, Kubernetes, etc.? Don't some of those systems already have security elements built in?

    Topic 5 - How does Anchore fit into some of the CI/CD systems, where developers could be adding random things into containers?

    Topic 6 - Topic 6 - How does the reporting and management framework fit into other existing security systems for the CISO?

    Posted by
    Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,
    Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)